The importance of evaluating events with accuracy and high professionalism

It is a mistake to believe that the event ends when the last guest leaves the event. Some believe that the plan has been successfully implemented and that there is no need for any additional steps. But the truth is that things go in the opposite direction. Event management is a complex and integrated process that includes several factors and stages, and among these important stages is evaluating events.

This step is a crucial point as it allows organizers to provide accurate reports and evidence to donors, partners, and the public regarding overall performance. In addition, evaluation contributes to knowing the success factors of events enhancing trust and transparency. And building strong relationships with various stakeholders.

The meaning of event evaluation

Event evaluation is the process of measuring and evaluating the performance of the event after it ends. The evaluation aims to determine the extent to which the desired goals have been achieved and to evaluate the quality of planning, implementation, and management. The evaluation also includes collecting and analyzing relevant information and data to reach conclusions and recommendations that can be applied in the future.

Mechanisms for evaluating a successful event

There is no specific set of mechanisms for evaluating the success of events. It depends on the nature and purpose of each event, whether it is a conference, exhibition, or festival. However, mechanisms can be classified into three main categories in general:

Quantitative mechanisms:

Rely on data and numbers that can be easily measured and compared. Such as the number of participants, attendance, absence and withdrawal rates, the number of visitors, likes, and comments on social media. As well as the number of partners and sponsors, revenues and expenses, and other quantitative indicators.

Qualitative mechanisms:

Rely on opinions, impressions, and experiences that can be interpreted objectively or personally. Such as the level of satisfaction with the quality and effectiveness of the conference and the extent of its impact on changing behavior, direction, performance, or results. The extent of benefit in learning, communication creativity, and other qualitative indicators.

Mixed mechanisms:

Rely on a combination of quantitative and qualitative data. Such as the percentage of achieving the specific goals of the conference. And the degree of compatibility between the expectations and reality of the conference participants. The extent of the participant’s commitment to the procedures or recommendations resulting from the conference, and other various indicators.

It is important to ensure that your evaluation of the event includes all three mechanisms together. You cannot be satisfied with one mechanism and neglect the others.

Event Evaluation Criteria

To properly evaluate an event, a set of criteria must be used that cover different aspects of the event. According to UNESCO, there are six main evaluation criteria, which we will explain in detail and in detail:

1. Achievement: This criterion focuses on the extent to which the event achieves the previously defined goals and results. It is about assessing the extent to which the event is able to achieve the desired goals and exceed the specified results.
2. Efficiency: It is about the extent to which the event uses the available resources in an optimal and acceptable manner. It evaluates how material, human, and financial resources are used effectively and within the budget specified for the event.
3. Impact: This criterion relates to the impact of the event on participants, beneficiaries, and target communities. It evaluates the extent to which the event achieves the desired impact and its ability to meet the needs of participants. And create a positive change in their lives.
4. Sustainability: This criterion focuses on the continuity of the event and its results after its end. It evaluates the possibility of the event’s impact continuing and the sustainability of the achieved results in the long term.
5. Appropriateness: Appropriateness here means the proportion of the event’s suitability to the needs, expectations and values ​​of participants and beneficiaries. Here we evaluate the suitability of the design and implementation of the event to meet the needs of the target groups and respect their values ​​and expectations.
6. Innovation: This criterion relates to the ability of the event to add new, distinctive, or unique value to its field. The ability of the event to innovate, stand out, and provide unique aspects that distinguish it from other events in the same field is evaluated.

Read also How to choose the right exhibition organizing company for your event.